Sunday, May 17, 2020

Can Iraq's New PM Reform the Country, Oppose Iran's Power?


As Mustafa Abdul-Latif Mishatat Al-Ghrebawi, otherwise known as Mustafa al-Kadhimi, takes charge this month as the new prime minister of Iraq, he faces quite challenging tasks.

The new premier began by promising to release jailed protesters and restore the retirement salary payments suspended by the outgoing prime minister, and implement reforms, among many other promises.  The important question is will he be able to reform the government’s institutions, root out corruption, and resolve many of Iraq’s complex problems, or at least begin the process of reform.

The primary obstacle to his success is neighboring Iran, which yields over-whelming influence in Iraq, similar to how the Soviet Union controlled the Eastern European countries of the now defunct Warsaw Pact. Iran’s control starts at the top. The various pro-Iranian Shia religious political parties and coalitions put in power by Bush's invasion in 2003, and backed by armed militias, control the country’s military, security forces, justice system, executive institutions, and have a majority in the parliament. These forces and groups in power, guided by Tehran dictate the policies any prime minister may take.

Originally Iran and its proxy politicians and militias in Iraq opposed Mustafa as the designate prime minister, accusing him of being pro-American. In fact one of these militias declared that his candidacy for prime minister was a “declaration of war” and they threatened to prevent him from taking office. All of a sudden, these politicians and militia leaders went silent, and gave approval to his premiership.

Media reports in Iraq spoke of a behind-the-scenes U.S.-Iran deal to waive Iranian opposition to Mustafa’s new post. Among the many news items that appeared just before he was sworn in as the new prime minister, was that the U.S. granted a four-month waiver on sanctions to allow Iraq to import electricity from Iran, and that Iranian assets valued over a billion dollars held in Luxemburg because of the sanctions were now approved by the U.S. to be transferred to Iran.

With cold-hard cash from Iraq for electricity and unfrozen assets from Luxembourg, it seems that Iran has been bought out, at least for now. So much for the “principles” Iran and their proxies in Iraq supposedly have against America. It seems everyone has a price.

Now that Mustafa has been sworn in, can he actually take measures to decrease Iran’s influence in Iraq and strengthen the country’s institutions?

For starters, why is Iraq importing electricity from Iran, since Iraq used to produce its own? The main reason is that pro-Iranian militias dismantled electric power stations in Iraq, like the huge electric plant in Beiji, creating a need to import. In addition, rather than repair the dilapidated electric stations and/or build new ones, these pro-Iranian politicians continue to neglect and ignore this issue and instead complain of sanctions on Iran. Even when Saudi Arabia offered to give Iraq electricity for FREE, these pro-Iranian leaders in Iraq refused and opted to pay cold hard cash to Iran instead.  In addition, recent “mysterious attackers” (because no one claims responsibility and security forces don’t investigate) have attacked and knocked out various large electric relay stations and towers in various provinces, to make the need even more acute.

In addition, similar “mysterious attackers” are going around Iraqi farms and burning wheat and grain fields, at a time when they are ripe for harvest. Thousands of acres of farmland have been torched. Conspicuously, Iran is flooding the produce markets in Iraq with cheap farm products to control the market. They create the need and then mysteriously provide the solution.

It is similar to how Iran flooded the Iraqi markets with the outdated poor quality “Saeba” cars, subsidized by the Iraqi government. To register a new imported car in Iraq costs over a $1,000 in fees. However, if the Iraqi citizen purchases an Iranian car, the Iraqi government will grant him a coupon and waive the registration fee, in effect making it free.  That is more cold hard cash for Iran, at Iraq’s expense.

The corruption in Iraq is huge and vast, with “ghost” employees in the government and members of government-sponsored militias receiving sizable salaries. There are huge salaries paid out to the supposedly former refugees in the Saudi Rafha camp, all of whom have been granted asylum in the U.S. and Europe, in the mid-1990s, well before the 2003 invasion. These supposed “victims” which include people who were never even in Rafha or have never seen Iraq, are receiving monthly salaries from the Iraqi government. These monthly payments for the “Rafha” claimants and “ghost” employees amount in the billions of dollars, draining the Iraqi treasury; funds that could be used to rebuild the infrastructure and revitalize the economy.    

Iran uses their proxy politicians and political parties in Iraq to make Iran-friendly economic and strategic policies, and legislate pro-Iran laws, like the law to fund the Popular Mobilization Militia (Al-Hashd Al-Shaabi) which is a sectarian religious paramilitary entity modeled after Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Iran uses this official militia umbrella group and other militia groups it controls, as well as former militiamen who have been merged into the Iraqi Army and Interior Department Security Forces to maintain its control of the country by force.

Through these various armed groups and paramilitaries, Iran's proxies have continued the policy of subjugation of Iraq’s Sunni Arabs, which according to 2003 and prior census figures amount to at least 40% of the population. Yet the Army, Security Forces, and most government ministries and agencies are now staffed about 90% Shia.

The large predominantly Sunni provinces, like Al-Anbar, Nineveh (Mosul), Salahadeen (Tikrit, Beiji, and other cities), Kirkuk, and Diyala, which were devasted by war and destruction over 3 years ago, are still largely in disrepair and without basic services. Millions of inhabitants, displaced and made refugees, have either not been allowed to return to their homes or unable to return due to the destruction.

Areas where Sunni Arabs have been victims of sectarian cleansing and forcibly expelled from their homes like Jurf-Sakhr in Babylon province, and areas of Diyala, are not allowed to return to their neighborhoods. The areas have been confiscated and are controlled by various militia groups. Tens of thousands of Sunni Arabs have languished in jails and detention centers for years without any trial or due process.

In welcoming Mustafa’s new post, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, stated on April 29, 2020, that “Iraqi leaders must put aside the sectarian quota system and make compromises that lead to government formation for the good of the Iraqi people…”

Can the new prime minister rectify the inequities of the discrimination and oppression of one of Iraq’s main communities? Can he abolish the sectarian quota system and make the institutions fair, equitable, and representative of the people? Can he release those tens of thousands of detainees, both the recent October protesters and the Sunni Arabs detained years ago? Can he rebuild the demolished areas and integrate the disenfranchised Sunni Arab community into the country’s national institutions?

Secretary Pompeo also said, “The Iraqi people need and deserve a government that frees the country from external intimidation, puts the prosperity of the Iraqi people first, and tackles the major challenges that continue to face Iraq.”

Can the new prime minister take the courageous decisions that put Iraq’s interests above that of Iran, and put an end to the Iranian control? Can he end the corruption and fraudulent waste of resources?  Time will tell.

Secretary Pompeo's statements can be found here:

https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-at-a-press-availability-4/

Wednesday, May 6, 2020


Trump Calls Bush's 2003 Invasion of Iraq "Worst Decision in History of Our Country"


In an interview with the New York Post, President Donald Trump on Monday (May 4, 2020) called former President George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq “the worst decision made in the history of our country.”

The paper quoted Trump as saying “...we spent $8 trillion in one of the worst decisions ever made to go into the Middle East, probably the worst decision made in the history of our country, going into the Middle East. Millions of people were killed on both sides...”

President Trump added “I would rate that as the worst decision made in the history of our country.”

The significance of these statements is that it came from another Republican president, and not from any of the Democratic presidents or candidates for president.

Neither former President Barack Obama nor former Vice-President Joe Biden who is currently running for president have made any such statements criticizing Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003, which was based on fraudulent claims of "weapons of mass destruction" and which killed, injured, and displaced millions of civilians and cost the US taxpayers trillions of dollars.  In addition, Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton who lost against Trump, also did not criticize Bush's war, which she and Biden both voted in the Senate to authorize Bush to launch the war in 2003.

Trump's latest criticism for the 2003 invasion debacle in which the Bush Administration dismantled all the security and defense institutions in Iraq and resulted in increase of terrorism and growth of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS and a civil war in Iraq, is remarkable for a Republican president. These statements come at a time when the U.S. is still facing threats to the country's interest in Iraq and the region, 17 years later, after the Bush invasion empowered Iran to control the Iraqi government and its resources and foment turmoil.

The interview with President Trump can be found here:

https://nypost.com/2020/05/05/trump-says-he-prevented-war-with-north-korea-slams-iraq-war/