Wednesday, December 30, 2020

 Iraq Bankrolls 40% of Iran's Budget

Iran just announced that it received another $700 million cash from Iraq. Iran's Energy Minister Redha Ardekaneyan made the announcement today on its government's "Khabar" channel. 

Even though the US Treasury prohibits Iraq from paying the Iranian government which is under sanctions, the 45-day waivers continue to be extended seemingly endlessly.

According to the World Bank, Iraq burns off or wastes about 18 billion cubic meters of gas annually, and Iraq is estimated to be the number two in the world for burning off gas after Russia.

Nevertheless, Iraq imports an estimated 240 to 420 million cubic meters annually from Iran, a fraction of what Iraq burns off, providing Tehran with millions of dollars of revenue.

In fact Iraq provides about $13 billion of Iran's official annual budget of $33 billion, about 40%.  In other words Iraq bankrolls 40% of Iran's operations which include its Revolutionary Guards militias, its militias in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen.

All this, while the Iraqi government squeezes the average Iraqi by delaying retirement payments to the elderly and limited income families.

To add insult to injury, Iran also announced that Iraq will buy for Iran, the Covid-19 vaccine from Europe. 

All thanks to George W. Bush for making Iraq a cash cow slave to Iran, by installing Iranian proxies in Baghdad.

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

Difference Between Biden and Trump On Iraq

Have to First Start with the 2003 Bush War & Occupation....

What Bush Did re: Iraq…

• Lied & Faked Information to Justify Illegal War
• Illegally Invaded & Occupied Iraq
• Abolished & Destroyed Iraqi National Institutions (like National Army) & Replace it with Sectarian Militias
• Placed Iranian Agents & Militias in Power in Iraq
• Allowed Iranian Agent Militias to Do "Cleansing" of Sunnis in Iraq
• Caused/Fueled Civil War Resulting in Death/Destruction
• Millions Killed or Made Refugees (Mostly Sunnis)

Then We Compare Biden to Trump....

What Obama/Biden Did re: Iraq…

• Biden Voted to Support Bush War in Senate
• Neither Obama nor Biden Condemned 2003 Invasion (Unlike Trump)
• Continued Same Bush Policies of Empowering Iranian Agents in Iraq (Dawa Party, Militias, & Other Groups)
• Allowed Iran-Proxies & Militias to Commit Death/Destruction in Iraq
• Lifted Sanctions on Iran to Continue Destruction
• Gave Iran Cash to Continue Destructive Policies
• Millions Continued to be Killed or Made Refugees in Iraq
• As VP, Biden Pressured Elected Secular Leader (Allawi) to Step Aside in Favor of Pro-Iran Proxy (Maliki) to Please Iran in Nuclear Deal Talks
• Watched While Iran-Proxies Violently Crushed Iraqi Peaceful Protestors in 2011 & 2012 in the Provinces like Anbar, Mosul, Salahdeen, Diyala, Baghdad, and Others
• Assisted Iraqi Govt Which Allowed ISIS Terrorist Criminals Take Over Major Cities like Mosul, Takrit, Ramadi, and Others by Withdrawing Iraqi Army without a Fight and Then Launching Air Campaigns to Obliterate these Civilian Centers 2014-2016.

What Trump Did re: Iraq…

• Called 2003 Invasion Worst Decision in American History (Unlike Biden)
• Stopped Policies of Empowering Iran
• Placed Sanctions on Iran & Their Militia Proxies in Iraq
• Forced Iraqi Govt to Stop Paying Iran Cash for Electricity & Other Imports 
• Cleaned Iraq of 2 Major Terrorist Criminals (Solaimani & Al-Mohandis) who Have Killed Thousands of Iraqis
• Cleaned Up Congress-Funded Al-Hurra TV Staff of Pro-Iranian Sectarian Propagandists
• Supported Iraqi Peaceful Protestors in 2019 & 2020


Sunday, May 17, 2020

Can Iraq's New PM Reform the Country, Oppose Iran's Power?


As Mustafa Abdul-Latif Mishatat Al-Ghrebawi, otherwise known as Mustafa al-Kadhimi, takes charge this month as the new prime minister of Iraq, he faces quite challenging tasks.

The new premier began by promising to release jailed protesters and restore the retirement salary payments suspended by the outgoing prime minister, and implement reforms, among many other promises.  The important question is will he be able to reform the government’s institutions, root out corruption, and resolve many of Iraq’s complex problems, or at least begin the process of reform.

The primary obstacle to his success is neighboring Iran, which yields over-whelming influence in Iraq, similar to how the Soviet Union controlled the Eastern European countries of the now defunct Warsaw Pact. Iran’s control starts at the top. The various pro-Iranian Shia religious political parties and coalitions put in power by Bush's invasion in 2003, and backed by armed militias, control the country’s military, security forces, justice system, executive institutions, and have a majority in the parliament. These forces and groups in power, guided by Tehran dictate the policies any prime minister may take.

Originally Iran and its proxy politicians and militias in Iraq opposed Mustafa as the designate prime minister, accusing him of being pro-American. In fact one of these militias declared that his candidacy for prime minister was a “declaration of war” and they threatened to prevent him from taking office. All of a sudden, these politicians and militia leaders went silent, and gave approval to his premiership.

Media reports in Iraq spoke of a behind-the-scenes U.S.-Iran deal to waive Iranian opposition to Mustafa’s new post. Among the many news items that appeared just before he was sworn in as the new prime minister, was that the U.S. granted a four-month waiver on sanctions to allow Iraq to import electricity from Iran, and that Iranian assets valued over a billion dollars held in Luxemburg because of the sanctions were now approved by the U.S. to be transferred to Iran.

With cold-hard cash from Iraq for electricity and unfrozen assets from Luxembourg, it seems that Iran has been bought out, at least for now. So much for the “principles” Iran and their proxies in Iraq supposedly have against America. It seems everyone has a price.

Now that Mustafa has been sworn in, can he actually take measures to decrease Iran’s influence in Iraq and strengthen the country’s institutions?

For starters, why is Iraq importing electricity from Iran, since Iraq used to produce its own? The main reason is that pro-Iranian militias dismantled electric power stations in Iraq, like the huge electric plant in Beiji, creating a need to import. In addition, rather than repair the dilapidated electric stations and/or build new ones, these pro-Iranian politicians continue to neglect and ignore this issue and instead complain of sanctions on Iran. Even when Saudi Arabia offered to give Iraq electricity for FREE, these pro-Iranian leaders in Iraq refused and opted to pay cold hard cash to Iran instead.  In addition, recent “mysterious attackers” (because no one claims responsibility and security forces don’t investigate) have attacked and knocked out various large electric relay stations and towers in various provinces, to make the need even more acute.

In addition, similar “mysterious attackers” are going around Iraqi farms and burning wheat and grain fields, at a time when they are ripe for harvest. Thousands of acres of farmland have been torched. Conspicuously, Iran is flooding the produce markets in Iraq with cheap farm products to control the market. They create the need and then mysteriously provide the solution.

It is similar to how Iran flooded the Iraqi markets with the outdated poor quality “Saeba” cars, subsidized by the Iraqi government. To register a new imported car in Iraq costs over a $1,000 in fees. However, if the Iraqi citizen purchases an Iranian car, the Iraqi government will grant him a coupon and waive the registration fee, in effect making it free.  That is more cold hard cash for Iran, at Iraq’s expense.

The corruption in Iraq is huge and vast, with “ghost” employees in the government and members of government-sponsored militias receiving sizable salaries. There are huge salaries paid out to the supposedly former refugees in the Saudi Rafha camp, all of whom have been granted asylum in the U.S. and Europe, in the mid-1990s, well before the 2003 invasion. These supposed “victims” which include people who were never even in Rafha or have never seen Iraq, are receiving monthly salaries from the Iraqi government. These monthly payments for the “Rafha” claimants and “ghost” employees amount in the billions of dollars, draining the Iraqi treasury; funds that could be used to rebuild the infrastructure and revitalize the economy.    

Iran uses their proxy politicians and political parties in Iraq to make Iran-friendly economic and strategic policies, and legislate pro-Iran laws, like the law to fund the Popular Mobilization Militia (Al-Hashd Al-Shaabi) which is a sectarian religious paramilitary entity modeled after Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Iran uses this official militia umbrella group and other militia groups it controls, as well as former militiamen who have been merged into the Iraqi Army and Interior Department Security Forces to maintain its control of the country by force.

Through these various armed groups and paramilitaries, Iran's proxies have continued the policy of subjugation of Iraq’s Sunni Arabs, which according to 2003 and prior census figures amount to at least 40% of the population. Yet the Army, Security Forces, and most government ministries and agencies are now staffed about 90% Shia.

The large predominantly Sunni provinces, like Al-Anbar, Nineveh (Mosul), Salahadeen (Tikrit, Beiji, and other cities), Kirkuk, and Diyala, which were devasted by war and destruction over 3 years ago, are still largely in disrepair and without basic services. Millions of inhabitants, displaced and made refugees, have either not been allowed to return to their homes or unable to return due to the destruction.

Areas where Sunni Arabs have been victims of sectarian cleansing and forcibly expelled from their homes like Jurf-Sakhr in Babylon province, and areas of Diyala, are not allowed to return to their neighborhoods. The areas have been confiscated and are controlled by various militia groups. Tens of thousands of Sunni Arabs have languished in jails and detention centers for years without any trial or due process.

In welcoming Mustafa’s new post, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, stated on April 29, 2020, that “Iraqi leaders must put aside the sectarian quota system and make compromises that lead to government formation for the good of the Iraqi people…”

Can the new prime minister rectify the inequities of the discrimination and oppression of one of Iraq’s main communities? Can he abolish the sectarian quota system and make the institutions fair, equitable, and representative of the people? Can he release those tens of thousands of detainees, both the recent October protesters and the Sunni Arabs detained years ago? Can he rebuild the demolished areas and integrate the disenfranchised Sunni Arab community into the country’s national institutions?

Secretary Pompeo also said, “The Iraqi people need and deserve a government that frees the country from external intimidation, puts the prosperity of the Iraqi people first, and tackles the major challenges that continue to face Iraq.”

Can the new prime minister take the courageous decisions that put Iraq’s interests above that of Iran, and put an end to the Iranian control? Can he end the corruption and fraudulent waste of resources?  Time will tell.

Secretary Pompeo's statements can be found here:

https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-at-a-press-availability-4/

Wednesday, May 6, 2020


Trump Calls Bush's 2003 Invasion of Iraq "Worst Decision in History of Our Country"


In an interview with the New York Post, President Donald Trump on Monday (May 4, 2020) called former President George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq “the worst decision made in the history of our country.”

The paper quoted Trump as saying “...we spent $8 trillion in one of the worst decisions ever made to go into the Middle East, probably the worst decision made in the history of our country, going into the Middle East. Millions of people were killed on both sides...”

President Trump added “I would rate that as the worst decision made in the history of our country.”

The significance of these statements is that it came from another Republican president, and not from any of the Democratic presidents or candidates for president.

Neither former President Barack Obama nor former Vice-President Joe Biden who is currently running for president have made any such statements criticizing Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003, which was based on fraudulent claims of "weapons of mass destruction" and which killed, injured, and displaced millions of civilians and cost the US taxpayers trillions of dollars.  In addition, Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton who lost against Trump, also did not criticize Bush's war, which she and Biden both voted in the Senate to authorize Bush to launch the war in 2003.

Trump's latest criticism for the 2003 invasion debacle in which the Bush Administration dismantled all the security and defense institutions in Iraq and resulted in increase of terrorism and growth of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS and a civil war in Iraq, is remarkable for a Republican president. These statements come at a time when the U.S. is still facing threats to the country's interest in Iraq and the region, 17 years later, after the Bush invasion empowered Iran to control the Iraqi government and its resources and foment turmoil.

The interview with President Trump can be found here:

https://nypost.com/2020/05/05/trump-says-he-prevented-war-with-north-korea-slams-iraq-war/

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Iraq's Sectarian Fallacy---"Fake News of Who is the Majority"

Iraq's Sectarian Fallacy---"Fake News of Who is the Majority"


Since 2003, the various parties and coalitions installed as successive governments in Baghdad by the Bush Administration and backed by their Iranian patrons are "legitimized" by the fabrication that there was a Shia "majority" in Iraq.

One of the greatest lies perpetuated to justify the 2003 invasion besides the fake "weapons of mass destruction" argument was the sectarian demographics of Iraq.

The Sunnis in Iraq consist of Arabs, Kurds, and most of the Turkoman communities. The Shia populations in Iraq is primarily Arab, but also include small Persian, Kurdish, and Turkoman communities.

To justify the sectarian politics, Sunnis were divided up into two primary ethnic groups: Sunni Arabs and Sunni Kurds. However the Shias were kept as one ethnic/religious group.

Even so, with the Arabs and Kurds together, the Sunnis comprised of 58% majority of the population. Without the Kurds, the Sunni Arabs still  have slight majority although it can be said the Arab Sunnis and Arab Shia are very close in number.

Here are hard numbers of the demographics of Iraq. According to the UN-approved Iraqi official census (which was approved by the US representative in the UN) which was submitted to distribute the food rations under the "Oil for Food" program in 2003, the population of Iraq was as follows:

The total number of people was 27,475,167 Iraqis

The religious minorities included 334,488 Christians (1%) and 281,984 Yazidis (1%).

The population was broken down by province:



If only the Arab provinces are included (without Kurdistan), the Arab-Sunni/Shia makeup is close to equal: 50% Sunni to 48% Shia in accordance with the provincial makeup (most of the predominately Sunni provinces have higher concentrations of populations than the predominately Shia provinces).

However if we add the Kurdistan provinces which are primarily Sunni, the percentages would be 58% Sunni and 40% Shia.

Using the "fake majority" argument as justification, Iranian-backed religious parties and militias aligned with the Bush Administration in 2003, abolished the existing Iraqi institutions and replaced them with mafia-like replacements controlled by these militias and mob-like parties.

One important example was the Iraqi Army, which was established by the British in 1921 after World War I, consisting primarily of former Ottoman Army officers. The same Iraqi Army established in 1921 continued throughout the mandate period (1921-1932), the Hashemite Monarchy (1932-1958) and throughout the Republican periods under Qassem, Arefs, Bakr, and Saddam (1958-2003). Even though the leaders and forms of governments drastically changed from one period to another, the army remained as a professional institution and represented all facets and denominations of Iraq, because of the mandatory conscription of all young men.  That conscription guaranteed that all religious and ethnic groups in Iraq were adequately represented in accordance with their actual numbers in Iraqi society.

The Bush-appointed ruler of Iraq in 2003, Paul Bremer, who had previously worked for Henry Kissinger at his Kissinger Associates firm, decided to abolish this national professional institution and replace it with militiamen from these religious sectarian groups who had a violent past and agenda to start a civil war, which they later did.

The new army was no longer representative of Iraqi society because the conscription was also abolished and now had only one sectarian identity and one goal--a religious virulent anti-Sunni agenda. It would be analogous to, if the US Army is one day abolished and replaced with paramilitaries from the Ku Klux Klan (KKK)---that would be a nightmare in America, especially for ethnic and religious minorities, if that ever happened....but that's what happened in Iraq in 2003.

As a result of these failed policies, millions of Sunnis have been expelled from their homes throughout the country since 2003, and hundreds of thousands have been either killed or still languish in jails, most without trials or access to any judicial process.

And to this day, the Shia religious parties control the Prime Minister's office, the Army, the Internal Security services and most of the government positions. The military is reportedly over 90% Shia. In addition, the militia-government also created a new all-Shia "Popular Mobilization Militia" to include as a government-sanctioned paramilitary umbrella group along with the Army to supposedly fight ISIS; probably because the newly created 2003 army was so corrupt and inept that they fled from the battlefield in 2014.

Even so, it is fair to say that these sectarian political parities have done nothing for the Iraqi population, neither Shia nor Sunni. The predominantly Shia areas still suffer from the lack of infrastructure projects, lack of basic services like electricity, proper clean water, sewage treatment, road infrastructures, and manufacturing. Gasoline and electricity is outsourced to neighboring Iran to please the militias' patrons. And that's why demonstrations erupted in October 2019 in the predominately Shia areas. Previously in 2011 and 2012, millions of Iraqis in the predominately Sunni areas went out in mass demonstrations but the militia-led government forces violently squashed them and arrested thousands.

All these failed policies were based on lies to justify the invasion.  Elections are rigged to guarantee that these militias and religious parties maintain control over power. The national wealth is squandered by corrupt national budgets guaranteeing payments for fake or ghost projects and salaries for ghost employees.

The only way Iraq will be stabilized and join the civilized community of nations is when the institutions of power become representative of the populace and not merely tools for the mobsters to stay in power. A stabilized and peaceful Iraq will lead to a peaceful region and world at large.